Barrios v. Foley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARTLETT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff seeks a judgment against defendant for $3,450- for services as a merchandise broker alleged to have been rendered in negotiating a sale of 600,000 pounds of dried grapes for the sum of $138,000 at an agreed compensation of 2% per cent of the purchase price. Defendant denied the indebtedness and set up as a special defense that the buyer, one T. Miwa Company, was at the time of the alleged sale financially irresponsible and without means, property, or credit to pay for the goods agreed to be sold.
The court found that about November 15, 1920, defendant employed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crosby v. Pacific S. S. Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Gammon v. Ealey & ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mitchell v. LocurtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- McFarland v. HeadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mcfarland v. HeadyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1954