Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Sorensen

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. 17889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Justice.

Defendants-Appellants David Allen Soren-sen, et al. (collectively “buyers”) appeal from a judgment and five prejudgment orders issued by the first circuit court in a contract dispute with the Plaintiffs-Appellees (collectively “trust beneficiaries”), beneficiaries of the Philip S. Arthur and Sarah L. Arthur Revocable Trusts (Trusts). In addition to preliminary matters of appellate jurisdiction, the fundamental issue raised in this case is a matter of statutory interpretation regarding Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 514A-62(e) (1993). 1

I. BACKGROUND

The facts in this case are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Aged Hawaiians v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. County of Kauai v. Pacific Standard Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Heatherly v. Hilton Hawaiian Village Joint VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kohala Agriculture v. Deloitte & ToucheHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Wong v. TakeuchiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
  5. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API