Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. 22172Published

1Opinion of the Court

52 P.3d 255 (2002)

99 Hawai`i 1

Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent,

v.

John DOE, Defendant-Appellee-Petitioner, and

John Doe II, Defendant-Appellee-Respondent.

No. 22172.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

July 10, 2002.

Barry D. Edwards, Honolulu, for defendant-appellee-petitioner, on the writ.

Mark Van Pernis (of Van Pernis, Smith & Vancil), Kailua Kona, for plaintiff-appellant-respondent.

Alan H. Tuhy, guardian ad litem.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, and NAKAYAMA, JJ.; RAMIL and ACOBA, JJ., not Joining.[1]

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C.J.

Defendant-appellee-petitioner John Doe [hereinafter, Alleged Father]…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API