Legal Opinion

Wong v. Takeuchi

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1996No. 15954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATANABE, Judge.

Because we (1) conclude that Plaintiff-Appellant Edmund S.P. Wong (Plaintiff) appeal ed from an order which was not final or appealable, and (2) disagree with Plaintiff that pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a), his notice of appeal from the nonfinal and nonappealable order was effectively filed upon the circuit court’s entry of the final judgment in this case, we dismiss Plaintiffs appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

For purposes of determining whether we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal, the following dates are…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Orthopedic Associates of Hawaii, Inc. v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Orthopedic Associates v. HigHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Schenk v. SchenkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API