Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. 22172PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

Defendant-appellee-petitioner John Doe [hereinafter, Alleged Father] timely petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari, which we granted, to review the opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in Doe v. Doe, 99 Hawai‘i 24, 52 P.3d 278 (2001) (ICA Op.). Alleged Father contends that the ICA erred in holding that Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) chapter 584, Hawaii’s version of the Uniform Parentage Act (1973) [hereinafter, UPA], prevents him from asserting defenses based upon res judicata and equitable estoppel in a paternity action. We agree with…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RogersHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. J.P.M. v. T.D.M.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Zane v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Estate of KamHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re JesusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API