Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Santino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 23, 1952PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
This action was brought to restrain the defendants from crossing land owned by the plaintiffs. The court issued a permanent in junction, as sought by the plaintiffs, and from the judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed.
The court found the following facts: The plaintiffs are husband and wife. On March 3, 1947, they bought a house and lot fronting on the north shore of a lake in West Haven and, since July of the same year, have occupied the premises as their home. The defendants are likewise husband and wife. In 1932, the defendant John Santino acquired title to land lying to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Aksomitas v. South End Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Taylor v. DennehySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Strang v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Shea v. GavittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swenson v. DittnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Mihalczo v. Borough of WoodmontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Leabo v. LeninskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Zavisza v. HastingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Goold v. GooldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.