Phillips v. Hooper
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KLETTE, J., pro tem.
This action involves a disputed boundary line between lot 54 of Roeding’s Villa Colony, and lots 1, 2, and 17 of MeCoon’s Boulevard Acres, in Fresno County. The complaint of plaintiff and appellant, is in two counts, the first seeking to quiet title to lot 54 of Roeding’s Villa Colony, and the second alleging that defendants and respondents had encroached upon said property with buildings, outbuildings, fences, and curbs, to the extent of fourteen feet, and prayed for a decree quieting title, and for a writ of restitution.
The evidence shows that Roeding’s Villa Colony was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Goldner v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Thom v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Poulsen v. Treasure State Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- McCollum v. ClothierUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Boas v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.