Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case involves plaintiffs attempt to change the party defendant after the statute of limitations has run. The court of appeals held the change was not allowable under the relation-back provision of Minn. R.Civ.P. 15.03. We agree and affirm.
The period of limitation for plaintiff-appellant Mark W. Johnson’s action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (a 3-year period) expired July 19, 1989. On July 14 plaintiff timely commenced his suit, naming Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company as defendant. Suit was commenced by delivering the summons and complaint to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Leaon v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Noske v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Carlson v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Robert Meeker v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.