Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 2000No. CO-98-1961PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.

The question before us is whether the defense of insufficient service of process, asserted by answer, is waived when defendant moves for partial summary judgment without having sought dismissal of the complaint for insufficient service of process. We hold that a defendant waives the defense of insufficient service of process, even though asserted by answer, by affirmatively invoking the jurisdiction of the district court to obtain partial summary judgment without earlier or simultaneously moving to dismiss the complaint for insufficient service of process. 1

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Yeldell v. TuttCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API