Legal Opinion
Klug v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 19, 1993No. 11080; 11081PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants, Eugene F. Green and the Torrington Inland Wetlands Commission (commission), appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiff’s appeal from a decision of the commission. The dispositive issues are (1) whether the plaintiff was entitled to party status before the commission under General Statutes §§ 4-166 (8)1 and 4-177a2 of the *87Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), and (2) whether the commission was required to hold a new public hearing upon remand from the previous trial court decision concerning this matter. We hold that the UAPA does not apply to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lashgari v. LashgariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Brothers v. American Home, No. Cv 940364725s (Aug. 25, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Durso v. VessichioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ottiano v. Shetucket Plumbing Supply Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.