Hayes v. Adams
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.
The plaintiffs commenced this suit to restrain and enjoin defendants from in any manner *52interfering with, plaintiffs’ use of a certain spring, to which the defendants had theretofore granted plaintiffs the free and unrestricted use, and from in any manner interfering with, or diverting, the underground stream or streams of water which feed the spring in question. A trial resulted in a decree for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
On and prior to the tenth day of March 1914, the date of the deed hereinafter mentioned, defendants were the owners of Lots Fifteen and Sixteen in the platted tract…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Collins v. Chartiers V. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. HawkOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Barclay v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Washington v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wellman v. Kelley & HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Jones v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Zimmerman v. Union Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.