Legal Opinion

Jones v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n of Thomasville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1960No. 382PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRicee, J.

Defendant, as it had a right to do (G.S. 1-134; Howze v. McCall, 249 N.C. 250, 106 S.E. 2d 236), filed in the Supreme Court a demurrer ore tenus to the complaint, and an amendment thereto allowed by the trial court in its discretion after'the close'of all the evidence introduced by plaintiffs and defendant, for the reason that the complaint, and the amendment thereto, does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that the complaint, and the amendment thereto, fails to allege that defendant had any knowledge of an underground stream running through its land or that any…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R. v. WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Clark v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ComptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Cheape v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Moore v. W O O W, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Ballinger v. Secretary of the Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API