Legal Opinion
Washington v. Oregon
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 2, 1936No. 11, originalPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
With leave of court (283 U. S. 801), the State of Washington filed ,a bill of complaint on July 22, 1931, in which it charged that the State of Oregon was wrongfully diverting the waters of the Walla Walla River to- the prejudice of inhabitants of Washington, and prayed an adjudication apportioning the interests of the two states in the river and in tributary streams and restraining any use or diversion of the waters found to be unlawful. To this complaint Oregon filed an answer containing denials and defenses, to which Washington replied. On February 20, 1933, this court appointed a Special…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Colorado v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.