Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1979No. 7821SC1130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The single issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate only “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c); Cox v. Funk, 42 N.C. App. 32, 255 S.E. 2d 600 (1979).

“Summary judgment is apt to be inappropriate in an action based on a complex scheme of fraud…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Huss v. HussCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Smith-Broadhurst, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Stratton v. Royal Bank of Can.North Carolina Business Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API