Legal Opinion
Frudden v. Pilling
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 31, 2012No. 3:11-cv-00474-RCJ-VPCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
This case arises out of the adoption of a school dress code at a public elementary school. Defendants have moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For the reasons given herein, the Court grants the motion.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Pro se Plaintiffs Mary and John E. Frudden are the parents of two minor children (the “Children”) who attend Roy Gomm Elementary School (“RGES”) in Reno, Nevada. (Compl. ¶¶ 4-5, Oct. 18, 2011, ECF No. 3). The RGES Parent Faculty Association, Inc. (“PFA”) is a nonprofit fundraising organization with no statutory…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jon Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mary Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jon Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020