Legal Opinion

Mary Frudden v. Kayann Pilling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2014No. 12-15403PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

This case represents the latest First Amendment challenge to a public school’s mandatory student uniform policy. Six years ago, in Jacobs v. Clark County School District, 526 F.3d 419 (9th Cir.2008), we held that a public high school’s mandatory uniform policy survives First Amendment scrutiny. Relying on Jacobs, the district court here dismissed Mary and Jon Frudden’s claim that the mandatory uniform policy at their children’s public elementary school, the Roy Gomm Elementary School (“RGES”), violates the First Amendment.

However, the RGES uniform policy differs…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jon Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Doe v. MarshallDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
  4. Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Hightower v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API