Legal Opinion

In Re W.R. Grace & Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 14, 2006No. 19-10309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

JUDITH K. FITZGERALD, United States Bankruptcy Judge.

The matters before the court are the opposing Motions for Summary Judgment 2 of the Debtors, W.R. Grace & Company (“Grace”), and a group of property damage claimants, Zonolite Attic Insulation Claimants (“ZAI Claimants”), and the ZAI Claimants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 3 regarding the threshold issue of what science demonstrates with regard to whether or not the presence of ZAI 4 in the home creates an unreasonable risk of harm. The court has consolidated the actions of the ZAI Claimants pursuant to…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Pritchard v. Dow Agro SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
  4. John Crane, Inc. v. LinkusCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Dixon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API