Legal Opinion
Pritchard v. Dow Agro Sciences
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 2010No. Civil Action 07-1621PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is Defendants Dow Agro Sciences (“Dow”) and Southern Mill Creek Products of Ohio’s (“Southern Mill”) Daubert motion challenging Plaintiffs Robert T. Pritchard and Elizabeth Ann Pritchard’s proffer of expert testimony by Dr. Bennet Omalu. (Docket No. 127). Dr. Omalu opines that Mr. Pritchard’s exposure to Dursban products, which were manufactured and sold by Defendants, caused him to develop Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (“NHL”). Defendants maintain that Dr. Omalu is not qualified to render his opinions in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Chantix (Varenicline) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- In Re Prempro Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
- Beylin v. WyethDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
- "R.D" v. Shohola Camp Ground and ResortDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Blanchard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Vermont Superior Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.