Legal Opinion

Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2014PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted allowance of appeal in this matter to determine whether the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 P.S. §§ 517.1-517.18 (the Act), bars a contractor from recovery under a theory of quantum meruit in the absence of a valid and enforceable home improvement contract as defined by the Act. The Superior Court held that the Act does not bar a *991cause of action sounding in quantum me-ruit and, for the reasons that follow, we affirm that decision albeit on slightly different grounds.

The facts of the instant appeal are not in dispute. In August, 2010, Appellants,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Alphonse Hotel Corp. v. TranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Summit School, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Melmark, Inc. v. Schutt by and Through SchuttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API