Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Pace

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 1915PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Court of Record for Escambia County; Kirke Monroe, Judge. Cockrell, J., dissenting.

1Opinion of the Court

■Whitfield, J.

A suit in equity was brought by the Receivers of the Pensacola State Bank, a banking corporation, existing under the laws of Florida, against J. E. Pace, ' a stockholder , of said, corporation, to recover $1,000.00 as the defendant’s statutory liability on his stock, it being alleged that the contracts, debts and engagements of said corporation are far in excess of the assets of said corporation, plus.a.sum of money, equal to the capital stock of said corporation at its par value. A demurrer to the bill was sustained on the ground-“that the-complainants are not the proper…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smathers v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Stone v. Union Stock Yards State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. BurbridgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bryan v. BullockSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Chavous v. GorntoSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Wibaux County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API