Hospelhorn v. Dusen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In this action plaintiff and appellant, as receiver for the Baltimore Trust Company, a banking corporation, sued one of its stockholders, Wanda V. Van Dusen, defendant and respondent, residing in California, to recover on a statutory stockholders’ liability under the statutes of Maryland. Respondent defended on the ground that her liability was barred by the provisions of section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California.
Appellant concedes that the statute of limitations (sec. 359, Code Civ. Proc.) of this state, is the statute to be applied in determining the question to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Royal Trust Co. v. MacBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Coombes v. GetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hospelhorn v. NewhoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941