Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Quantic

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 17,122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note for $4000 with interest from April 8, 1903. The note was executed by Henry Quantic, payable to the order ■of A. G. Cress, and the petition contained an allegation that before maturity and for value defendant Cress indorsed and delivered the note to the plaintiff. The answer set up various defenses, including a failure ■of consideration,- that the plaintiff was not the holder in due course, and denied the indorsement of the note by Cress. The jury made a number of special findings and returned a verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Foote v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. McDonald v. MulkeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Canal Winchester Bank v. ExlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. State v. BulnaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API