Legal Opinion

Canal Winchester Bank v. Exline

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1938No. 2826PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff's action against defendants was predicated upon a cognovit note. The petition was in the short form and judgment taken on the warrant of attorney. The petition averred that the plaintiff acquired the note from the payee for valuable consideration, namely, $200, on November 16, 1936. Judgment was entered September 29, 1937.

In January, 1938, during the term in which the judgment was rendered, defendants moved for its suspension on the grounds that it was taken upon a warrant of an attorney and defendants were not summoned or otherwise legally notified of the time and place of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Underwood v. QuanticSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Miller v. McGillOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Voorhees v. FisherUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Graham v. Dayton Morris Plan BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matson v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Brenner v. ShoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Bellows v. BowlusOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. McMillen v. Willard Garage, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Kramer Realty Co. v. GlanderOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API