Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Fosha

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1913No. 18,075; No. 18,527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from Riley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

These appeals are from a judgment in which the plaintiff recovered upon one of two promissory notes, and was denied a recovery'upon the other. The notes are for $1333.33 each, dated April 23, 1903, made by Fosha and endorsed by Quantic. They were made payable in nine and twelve months from date, respectively. The recovery was upon the twelvemonths note. Special findings were made and a general verdict rendered. The plaintiff moved for judgment on the nine-months note, notwithstanding the *769verdict. The defendants moved to set aside certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Edwards v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Underwood v. QuanticSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Smith v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Packer v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Whitacre v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API