Legal Opinion

State v. Bulna

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 19, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wacheneeld, J.

The defendant, Andrew Bulna, was convicted of forging an assignment of a certificate of ownership of an automobile owned by his wife, Mary Bulna, with intent to “prejudice, injure, damage and defraud the said Mary Bulna, contrary to the provisions of N. J. 8. 2A :109-1.”

The Appellate Division reversed on the ground that the trial judge had unduly restricted the defendant’s right to cross-examine a handwriting expert produced on behalf of the State, holding:

“Under all the circumstances, particularly the heavy dependence of the verdict of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Hoag v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Rose v. First National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GrazianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. State v. MunizNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. State v. PapitsasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. State v. DancygerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. State v. TraversNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API