Commonwealth v. DeBlase
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
We are asked to decide whether the Pennsylvania Wiretap Act1 permits an exception for the unauthorized interception of telephone conversations where the person who made the tape recordings was subsequently murdered. We are also asked to determine whether the sixth amendment right to counsel attaches to the pre-arrest use of a consensual body wire on the particular facts presented in this case. We find no justification for an exception to the Wiretap Act and affirm the suppression of the taped telephone conversations. We find that the sixth amendment right to counsel did not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.