Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kean

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1989No. 01304 and 01305PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This case presents what the trial court described as a “strange search and seizure issue ... which may be unique in the annals of the criminal justice system____” The issue is whether the appellants’ rights under the federal and state constitutions were violated when the court refused to suppress a videotape which showed the appellants participating in sexual activities in the bedroom of their home. This videotape had been surreptitiously recorded by two juveniles and was subsequently given to the police by the mother of one of them. The videotape was then viewed by the police…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. DunnavantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API