Legal Opinion
Hasselt v. Lufthansa German Airlines
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 18, 2003No. SC 16739PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this appeal1 is whether, under General Statutes § 31-307a (c),2 the defendant *418second injury fund (fund) is required to reimburse employers for all cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) paid to qualifying employees sustaining injuries within, the time period prescribed by the statute, thereby exposing the fund to an indeterminate liability, or whether the fund’s liability is limited to COLAs accrued during that time period. The defendant fund appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.