Legal Opinion
United States v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1986No. Nos. 85-5170(L), 85-5171 and 85-5172PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Lorenzo Allen, Frances Sylvester Lindsey and Roger Lee Harrell were convicted by a jury of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) and of conspiracy to commit that offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The main issue on appeal concerns the propriety of testimony by a police officer and a parole officer identifying Allen and Harrell as the individuals appearing in bank surveillance photographs. Finding no error in the use of this testimony, or in other actions asserted as error by appellants, we affirm.
I
On February 12, 1985, shortly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James E. Davis v. Harry L. Allsbrooks, Warden of the Northhampton Co. Prison State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carey Antonio PIERCE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.