Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2011No. COA10-1273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Evidence of the Daddy Rabbit’s break-in was properly admitted under the “course of conduct” or “complete story” exception. The evidence admitted under the “course of conduct” exception was also properly admitted under North Carolina Rule of Evidence 403. Detective Shuler was properly allowed to give lay opinion testimony relating to items stolen from Wal-Mart, the appearance of blood, and the matching of wood panel fragments. Where Detective Shuler had more familiarity than the jury with defendant’s appearance at the time of the crime, he was properly allowed to identify…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. AgeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API