Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Rumsey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1987No. C6-86-1148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Dawn Alison Rumsey appeals from a $41,806 judgment entered in favor of respondent Rebecca Nordquist Anderson contending the trial court erred by allowing opposing counsel to comment during closing argument about the effect of the jury’s answer to a question in the special verdict, by allowing opposing counsel to comment about the size of an award, and by allowing testimony about insurance coverage. We affirm.

FACTS

Anderson’s neck and back were injured in an automobile accident with Rumsey. A jury awarded her $35,000. Rumsey alleges at least three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Connaker v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molkenbur v. HartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Ruppert v. YaegerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API