Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Richmond

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1980No. Civ. 46672PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Plaintiff Gudrun Richmond (hereafter for convenience, Gudrun) appeals from a portion of an order modifying downward, spousal support from Henry Richmond (for convenience also, Henry), in an action she had commenced to establish a State of New York divorce judgment. The portion of the order at issue provided the following: “Said obligation for spousal support shall continue through the month of September 1981, at which time spousal support shall forever terminate and the jurisdiction of this Court over the issue of spousal support shall terminate, unless prior to September…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Marriage of BrantnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Schmir v. SchmirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. In Re Marriage of Prietsch & CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API