Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 2000No. 25181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Petitioner pled nolo contendere to threatening a public official.1 Petitioner filed a writ of certiorari to review the denial of his post-conviction relief (PCR) petition. We reverse.

ISSUE

Was trial counsel ineffective in advising petitioner that threatening a public official was a misdemeanor?

*97DISCUSSION

The PCR judge found trial counsel’s performance was not deficient and petitioner had failed to prove prejudice. Petitioner contends the PCR judge erred. We agree.

A plea of nolo contendere is for all practical purposes treated as a guilty plea. Kibler v. State, 267 S.C. 250, 227…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Hinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Davie v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Custodio v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API