Legal Opinion

Cherry v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 4, 1989No. 23110PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Laverne Holiday Cherry was convicted of first degree burglary and received a twenty year sentence. Cherry filed an application for Post-Conviction Relief (PCR) on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing, his application was denied. We granted Cherry’s Petition for Certiorari to review the findings of the PCR court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 50(9).

Cherry contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel (1) failed to object to the solicitor’s references to Cherry as “Doc Holliday” and (2) failed to ensure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. GoldenbaumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API