Wolfe v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
In this action for Post-Conviction Relief (“PCR,”), the PCR court granted relief to William Wolfe based on ineffective assistance of counsel at Wolfe’s guilty plea proceeding. We reverse.
Factual/Procedural Background
In early 1994, Wolfe was indicted for assault and battery with intent to kill (“ABIK”) and possession of a firearm or knife during the commission of a violent crime. The case was called for trial in May 1 994. During the pre-trial motion hearing, the trial judge refused to grant Wolfe a continuance to get a mental evaluation and also indicated, though without ruling…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Roddy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Moorehead v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Holden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.