Legal Opinion

Hinson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 1989No. 22986PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

In this post-conviction matter Petitioner Robert S. Hinson (Hinson) contends that his trial attorney’s erroneous advice concerning parole eligibility rendered his guilty plea invalid. We agree and reverse the denial of post-conviction relief.

On July 9, 1979, Hinson was indicted for murder for his part in a robbery attempt which resulted in the death of one Teagus Griffis. The following day he pled guilty to the crime of “common-law murder” and was sentenced to life in prison.

Prior to the plea, Hinson was advised by his attorney that a ten year parole eligibility applied to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. United States v. Castro-TaverasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API