Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. First Wireless Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 19, 2004No. 03-CV-4990 (JS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is a motion by Defendant, First Wireless Group, Inc. (“First Wireless” or “Defendant”), pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion seeks to set aside a portion of Judge Arlene R. Lindsay’s Order, dated June 15, 2004 (“June Order”), which denied the Defendant pre-trial access to the immigration status and tax returns of the aggrieved parties (“Charging Parties”).1
Rule 72 provides in pertinent part that
[a] magistrate judge to whom a pretrial matter not dispositive of a claim or defense of a party is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Flores v. AmigonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Weiss v. La SuisseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
3Cited by21 opinions
- Summa v. Hofstra UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Maria Cazorla v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection BoardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.