Legal Opinion
Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 30, 2018No. 14 Civ. 2590 (VM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
III. DISCUSSION
Rule 26(b)(1) generally entitles parties to "discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant ... and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues as stake in the action ... and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1).
Although not couched in terms of Rule 26, Royal Park's core objection is that Magistrate Judge Lehrburger wrongly determined that Royal Park is required to prove liability and damages on a "loan-by-loan" basis. (Pl. Mem. at 9.)4 Specifically,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ambac Assur. Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortg. Capital Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. Barnes and Noble, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Cousin v. Gordon & Silber, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.