Legal Opinion

United States v. Schelin

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 9, 1981No. CMR No. ACM S25219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Judge:

We hold that retail merchandise of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) is not “military property” within the meaning of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice. We also set aside, as fatally defective, a separate charge and specification which attempts to allege concealment of stolen property.

Consistent with her pleas, the accused was convicted by special court-martial of absence without leave, wrongful disposition of military property, and concealing stolen property, violations of Articles 86, 108, and 134, Code, supra. The approved sentence extends to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. FoutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. BriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. PetreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. Jones v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. United States v. HarveyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SchelinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. FordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. ChitwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. FordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. FordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API