Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ford

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 13, 1990No. ACM 27930Published

1Concurrence

Chief Judge HODGSON

(concurring in the result):

I am in full agreement with the majority’s disposition of this case. However, I would go farther and hold that while money buys weapons and material which become military property, the money itself does not attain that status. Thus, it’s nature as appropriated or non-appropriated funds is immaterial, and a nexus must exist between the property alleged as military in nature and its intended use by the military.

At trial the prosecution successfully maintained that while money and commercial paper themselves are not uniquely military in nature, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SchelinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. SchelinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API