Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 12, 1978No. NCM 78 0903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error, and the Government’s reply thereto, and we conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

In the specification under Charge II, appellant was charged with wrongful sale of property of the Navy Exchange, Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, in violation of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 908. Appellant argues that property of the Navy Exchange does not constitute “military property of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. BusicU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SchelinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. FordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. BellettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. PackerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. SchelinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API