Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 13, 1989No. Nos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
We have before us two cases, Case No. 89-4003 and Case No. 89-4009, from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) that have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. We deal with each case separately.
I. Case No. 89-4003
In Case No. 89-4003, the Board petitions for enforcement of its order that found *1571respondent United Technologies Corporation (employer or company) in violation of §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and 158(a)(5) (1982), for having failed to include production control coordinators in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beth Israel Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- H.B. Mac, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Superior Court · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corporation, and District 91, Lamaw, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Lodge 700, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Technologies Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989