Legal Opinion
McC Eurochem v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 4, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-13; Court 10-00260PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
GORDON, Judge.
Defendant moves pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) to partially dismiss Plaintiff MCC Eurochem’s (“Eurochem”) complaint challenging the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) administrative review covering solid urea from Russia during the July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009 period of review. See Solid Urea from Russia, 75 Fed.Reg. 51,440 (Dep’t of Commerce Aug. 20, 2010) (final results) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, A-821-801, AR 2008/09 (Aug. 13, 2010), available at http://ia.ita.d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Skf USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MCC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- McC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011