Acciaierie Valbruna S.p.A. v. United States

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge: The case presents an issue that has been before this Court and the Federal Circuit many times - whether the relief provided under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”) is retrospective, prospective, or both. See, e.g., Corus Staal BV v. United States, 502 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2007); Corus Staal BV v. United States, 32 CIT_,_, 593 F. Supp. 2d 1373, 1382-83 (2008). This particular action concerns the effect of a determination made by Commerce under Section 129 on certain stainless steel bar manufactured in Italy and imported into the U.S. by…