Legal Opinion
Chevron USA, Inc. v. Bronster
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 2004No. 02-15867PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle (“Hawaii”) appeals the district court’s holding on remand that Section 3(c) of Act 257 of the 1997 Hawaii State Legislature (“Act 257” or “the Act”) effects a regulatory taking in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Chevron USA, Inc. (“Chevron”) challenged the Act, which, inter alia, proscribes the maximum rent that oil companies can collect from dealers who lease company-owned service stations.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and we affirm.
I
In response to concerns about…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- MHC Financing Ltd. Partnership v. City of San RafaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Huppert v. City of PittsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Guggenheim v. City of GoletaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Minidoka Irrigation District v. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.