Legal Opinion
Harris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2005No. 03-56639; D.C. No. CV-01-09688-MMMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
In this Federal Tort Claims Act case, plaintiff Jacquelyn Harris challenges the district corut’s order precluding her expert witness from testifying because she did not disclose the expert’s designation and report until eight days before trial. We review a district court’s decision to exclude expert testimony or otherwise impose sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 for abuse of discretion. Childress v. Darby Lumber, Inc., 357 F.3d 1000, 1009-10 (9th Cir.2004). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Childress v. Darby Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Chevron USA, Inc. v. BronsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sawako Kakuwa and Pacific Ocean Development Co., Inc. v. Adrian C. Sanchez Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- MMI Products, Inc. v. LongDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Brian Joseph Gref v. American International IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- In re Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Jimenez v. RameauDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Newsome v. Dignity-Kindred Rehabilitation Hospital East Valley LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023