Legal Opinion
Snaza v. City of Saint Paul, Minn.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2008No. 08-1604PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Suzanne Snaza commenced this action against the City of St. Paul alleging that her constitutional rights to substantive due process, equal protection, and just compensation were violated by denial of her application for a conditional use permit. The district court 1 granted the city’s motion for summary judgment. Snaza appeals, and we affirm.
In 1999 Snaza’s father, Bernard, applied for a conditional use permit from the city planning commission to operate an outdoor auto sales lot on a property at 1229 Payne Avenue in St. Paul, Minnesota. The property is zoned B3, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aaron v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Mark Koscielski Barbara Bergstrom, Individually and D/B/A Koscielski's Guns and Ammo v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Heath Adkisson v. Blytheville School District 5Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Dahlen v. Shelter HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- McGuire v. Independent School District No. 833Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Arrigoni Enters., LLC v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.