Williamson v. Egan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LANGDON, J.—
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment against them in an action to recover rental value of teams of horses and mules used in the construction of certain public work.
The defendant Egan was the contractor and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company was the surety upon his statutory bond.
The findings of fact state' the case shown by the record and are, substantially, as follows: That on or about the twenty-fourth day of October, 1923, defendant Egan made and entered into a contract with the city of Santa Cruz, by the terms of which said defendant was to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Atherton v. CorlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Young v. OrpheusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Hub Hardware Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liab. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Levert v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. CuppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bernard v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- California Electric Supply Co. v. United Pacific Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.