Legal Opinion

De Sandro v. Missoula Light & Water Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1913No. 3,305PublishedCited by 24 opinions

'Appeal from District Court, Missoula County; F. C. Webster, Judge. Action by Angelo De Sandro against tbe Missoula Light & Water Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant company appeals.

Read the full summary

'Appeal from District Court, Missoula County; F. C. Webster, Judge. Action by Angelo De Sandro against tbe Missoula Light & Water Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant company appeals. The only evidence that in any way tends to show control in anyone other than Hadalin and his foreman was one statement’ alleged to have been made by Manager Wright to Odenwald, the. foreman of Hadalin: “Keep these men here to-morrow; I want, this work done.” We submit that this might have been a re-', quest, an unwarranted direction, or if…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantlt

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by him during the course of his employment as a servant, by the defendant Missoula Light & Water Company. Adam Hadalin was also made a defendant, but the jury found in his favor. Plaintiff has not appealed, nor did he reserve and incorporate in the record exceptions to any rulings adverse to him during the course of the trial. The Missoula Light & Water Company has appealed from the judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial. This defendant, hereinafter referred to as “the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Linnehan v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Monson v. La France Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Missoula Light & Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fisher v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Surman v. CruseMontana Supreme Court · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API