Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. James

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1889No. 2543PublishedCited by 69 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Hobby, Judge.—

This suit for damages grew out of the arrest and alleged malicious prosecution of the appellee, James, for the offense of perjury, by the appellant acting through its general manager, Webster Snyder, and Spillane, his clerk, acting under said manager’s directions, all of whom are jointly and severally sued. The petition contains all of the allegations necessary to maintain the action.

The defense was a general denial, plea of res adjudicata, probable cause, and that appellant acted without malice. Exceptions were sustained to the plea of res adjudicata. A trial resulted in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wootters v. KauffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hudson v. WilkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Pearce v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. S. Jacobs, Bernheim & Co. v. CrumTexas Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Munford, Inc. v. PetersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API